remember like in 97' it was Qld, Nsw and NZ. The blues won it back then, lets face it aus v nz is a one horse race and the kiwis want more rep games. It will be a home and away comp with 7 games, 6 games + the final. Or just keep it at 6 games and the leader after round 6 is the winner. Sort of work out like this Game 1: Nsw v Qld @ Sfs Game 2: Nsw v NZ @ Win Game 3: Qld v NZ @ skilled Game 4: Qld v Nsw @ suncorp Game 5: Nz v Qld @ auckland Game 6: Nz v Nsw @ wellington Game 7: top 2 play in final if req.
Rugby League - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
The Super League was a dead set joke, including this tri-series crap. It really should be forgotten about. New Zealand will never compete against the two states again for two reasons. One being that our State Of Origin is firm on tradition and is sure as hell not going to include them into the series and two, there wouldnt be a realistic time frame on the RL calender to fit this in. This many rep players would not depart from their club for such a lengthy duration while the season is being played. Then we have the Four Nations straight after and you can bet that wont be getting changed due to England's involvement in the game- they'd go bonkers. And then after the Four Nations the off-season begins so there's just no way whatsoever this would ever happen. New Zealand gets just as many games as Australia does so why would they feel the need to intrude in on our traditional state v state series "just to get more rep games?" Its pointless. It has nothing to do with NZ. They just need to focus on the international games like every other country.
2 :
No, the tri nations was only brought in to counter the ARL's State of Origin. With the Kiwis as world cup holders it is a bit of an insult for them to have to play state sides in competition. No way would the NRL, the broadcasters or the clubs allow for a comp like this.
